The Hope Accord - Where it Succeeds and Where it Fails

by Scott Creighton

Hope?

Hmmm. Where have I seen that before?

Oh yeah. There it is.

Dr. Campbell was going off on the Hope Accord yesterday. He's all excited about it. Read off the short list of names on their front page. Currently they have about 23,000 people who have signed it. 20,000 of them are just regular Joes while the rest are doctors, scientists and other medical professionals. Only 700 doctors. Doesn't specify what kind of doctors. 

Is John Campbell signed on as a 'doctor'?

There are 5 parts to the accord:

1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS

2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS

3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED 

4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA

5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT

On their own the accords are... fine I guess. I mean, how can anyone argue against statements like this:

'Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations' Accord 4

Our entire corrupted system is based on the principle of  'never let a good crisis go to waste as it is a chance to get things done the people would not normally tolerate' so coming out saying we should not abandon our principles due to perceived emergencies is kind of a polyanna approach to countering their main tool to transform our society.

In short, it's been said  many times in the past and was said during the Covid-19 psyop by a lot of us to no avail. 

And here we are again saying the same thing. Sure it sounds good. Like 'stop killing children in Gaza' sounds good but it is a sound strategy of resistance, just repeating the same shit we've been saying for DECADES?

'This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.' Accord 1

Now this accord is summed up neatly but the only problem is... it ONLY deals with Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products... not other mRNA products that are currently being rolled out and developed.

Bold move now that NO ONE IS TAKING THE COVID VACCINES ANYMORE. So how brave is it really to come out saying we should stop giving em out? Instead what they SHOULD have stated in their accord is that NO MRNA treatment has EVER been proven effective at ANYTHING and based on their own research, the industry has shown they are more harmful than helpful at this stage.

And yet:

'Last month, the biotech division of the German firm Wacker inaugurated a spanking new mRNA production facility in Halle, where, per the company, il will be able to manufacture up to 200 million doses of mRNA vaccines per year. The facility reportedly cost some €100 million to build.

But 200 million doses of mRNA vaccines for what?' Panda Uncut

They are dumping billions upon billions upon billions of dollars into manufacturing facilities for these products and they are doing it in such a way as to suggest they expect a very rapid return on their investments.

What does this accord do to prevent another travesty of medical principals being ignored in the event of yet another manufactured crisis (which this accord says nothing about investigating who made Sars-CoV-2 BTW)?

'This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists.' Accord 1

They don't say it was wrong to grant that authorization, they state the emergency no longer exists, so they should stop using the Covid-19 jabs. Does that mean if suddenly another outbreak develops, the authors of this Accord would be OK with using them again? 

Are they suggesting if a NEW virus comes along, it's just fine to use untested mRNA jabs to combat that one? 

'Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products.' Accord 2

No. We need a comprehensive evaluation of all MRNA PRODUCTS vaccines and others. None of them are effective. None of them are safe. None of them are worth the risk.

And yet they are the Golden Ticket to so many investors and pharmaceutical companies right now with billions of dollars being poured into development of facilities to crank these things out 'in the event' of another 'emergency use' crisis as of yet to be manufactured... just like the last one.

The Hope Accord isn't entirely useless. It just seems remarkably limited in it's ambition and scope as it misses the mark by quite a bit when it comes to addressing the most serious concerns we should have as a society.

Yes, what they are calling for would restore some lost faith in our medical professionals and the industry itself.

However, being so far off target leaves one wondering if it missed by happenstance, by malpractice or by complicity. 

This writer has no answer to that rather important question.

Rather than presenting itself as a 'HOPE' made with hat in hand, perhaps it would be better served to represent itself as a set of PRINCIPLED RESOLUTIONS or DEMANDS that put on our glorious leaders ie. we refuse to participate in any future mandates with these products regardless of the crisis created to justify their acceptance. We refused to be silenced. We refuse to be shamed. We refuse to oblige the next round of detrimental decrees they will undoubtedly impose on us which will cause further harm rather than a reduction in risk.

And as professionals in the medical industry, it would be reassuring to know those who signed this accord will not yield to pressure and pass off the next plandemic 'cure' until such time as it is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be safe... AND EFFECTIVE.

Who cares about taking a stand, in hindsight, against mRNA Covid-19 jabs? No one is taking them anymore anyway.

Take a stand against their next round of experimental poison... you know... the one they are already preparing for.

Do that and I'll be impressed.